Skip to main content

Phase 3 TROIKA Results Demonstrate Clinical Similarity Between HD201 and Trastuzumab Reference in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Interim results from the phase 3 TROIKA trial demonstrate clinical equivalence between the biosimilar HD201 and trastuzumab reference in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

At the European Society for Medical Oncology Virtual Congress 2020, the results of the TROIKA trial, a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study that compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the proposed trastuzumab biosimilar HD201 compared with trastuzumab reference in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer, were presented.

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive HD201 or trastuzumab reference as neoadjuvant therapy for 8 cycles in combination with chemotherapy; chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of docetaxel followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. Following surgery, patients received 10 cycles of HD201 or trastuzumab reference monotherapy as adjuvant therapy for up to 30 weeks. The primary end point was total pathologic complete response (tpCR) rate after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery up to 30 weeks; secondary end points included breast pathologic complete response (bpCR), overall response rate, event-free survival, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety.

A total of 503 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer were enrolled in the study; of these, 238 patients were treated with HD201 and 236 patients with trastuzumab reference, and were included in the per-protocol analysis group and evaluated for efficacy.

In the per-protocol population, the tpCR rates were similar between the groups (HD201, 46.60%; trastuzumab reference, 46.20%); equivalence between HD201 and trastuzumab reference was established, as the between-group difference in tpCR rate was 0.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], –8.6%-9.6%), with the 95% CIs contained within the predefined equivalence margins (–15%; 15%). The bpCR rate was 55.00% in the HD201 group and 53.40% in the trastuzumab reference group; the overall response rate was 90.80% and 89.40%, respectively.

The safety analysis included 250 patients in the HD201 group and 252 patients in the trastuzumab reference group. During the neoadjuvant phase, safety profiles among the groups were similar in terms of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; HD201, 96.4%; trastuzumab reference, 95.6%), serious TEAEs (HD201, 5.6%; trastuzumab reference, 4.4%), and TEAEs grade ≥3 (HD201, 29.2%; trastuzumab reference, 25.0%). Common TEAEs of any grade occurring in ≥10% of patients included alopecia, asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, stomatitis, and arthralgia. With regard to immunogenicity, the incidence of antidrug antibodies developed in the HD201 and trastuzumab reference groups was comparable.

At the onset of cycle 8, the mean steady-state Ctrough level in the HD201 group was 53.72 µg/mL in the HD201 group and 51.64 µg/mL in the trastuzumab reference group. The mean relative between-group difference was 4.0% [–2.6%; 10.6%], which was contained within the prespecified interval [–20%; 20%]; therefore, PK equivalence was established.

Interim results from the TROIKA trial demonstrate equivalence between HD201 and trastuzumab in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Reference
Xavier P, et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 166MO.

Related Items
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs, ASCO Highlights
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Article, Biosimilars, Transplant
Oncologists’ Common Misconceptions About Biosimilars Revealed in a Recent Survey
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60 versus Bevacizumab Reference in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous NSCLC
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or PFG-cbqv Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Bendamustine plus Rituximab and CHOP±R Regimens in Patients with Lymphoma and CLL
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Prophylaxis in miniCHOP Chemotherapy-Based Regimens for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Bevacizumab-awwb in Real-World Oncology Clinics
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Impact of the Oncology Care Model on Use of Bone Supportive Medications, Antiemetics, and Growth Factors
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Cost-Efficiency Analysis of Conversion from Pegfilgrastim with On-Body Injector to Pegfilgrastim-jmdb to Provide Budget-Neutral Expanded Access to Prophylaxis and Treatment
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars