Skip to main content
LATE-BREAKING RESEARCH: Practice Management Research
Abstract #LB03

Evaluation of the Reliability of 5-FU Elastomeric Pump in an Ambulatory Infusion Center

JHOP - March 2022 Vol 12 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts

Presenter: Quan Li, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS, Clinical Coordinator, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC

Co-Author: Alice Beers, BSN, OCN, NPD-BC, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC

BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) is often used in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies through an ambulatory infusion pump.1,2 However, the infusion rate of elastomeric pumps is affected by environmental and patient factors.3,4 Monitoring drug delivery by the pump is essential to treatment efficiency and drug safety.5 Visual inspection, as recommended in the package insert, is not reliable. A quantitative method to assess the delivery of 5-FU via an elastomeric pump is in great need. Recently, Cusano and colleagues showed the feasibility to monitor 5-FU delivery via Baxter elastomeric pump by comparing pump weights before and after infusion.6 However, more than 24% of the pumps had remaining fluid of >10%, suggesting insufficient delivery of the elastomeric pumps.6,7

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of SMARTeZ elastomeric pump to deliver 5-FU, by measuring the percentage of pumps that deliver >90% of expected 5-FU dose at the end of 46 hours of infusion.

METHOD: This retrospective chart-review study included patients who were at least 18 years old, diagnosed with GI cancer and treated with intravenous 5-FU continuous infusion over 46 hours through elastomeric pump between April 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021. Pregnant females or patients younger than 18 years old were excluded. The primary end point was the reliability of the 5-FU elastomeric pump, measured by the percentage of elastomeric pumps delivering >90% of expected 5-FU doses. Secondary end points included the average percentage of 5-FU delivery of each pump, the average weight of empty, and full and returned empty pump.

RESULTS: A total of 24 patients and 117 pumps were included in the analysis. Overall, 95.7% of the patients received >90% of expected 5-FU dose. The average percentage of 5-FU delivery was 94.9% ± 7.3%. The average weight of empty, full, and returned pumps was 92.9 g ± 1.3 g, 335.1 g ± 1.5 g, and 105.4 g ± 17.7 g, respectively.

CONCLUSION: SMARTeZ elastomeric pumps were reliable to deliver 5-FU continuous infusion over 46 hours for patients with cancer.

  1. Sabbagh Dit Hawasli R, Barton S, Nabhani-Gebara S. Ambulatory chemotherapy: past, present, and future. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021;27:962-973.
  2. Backler C. Which ambulatory infusion pump is best for 5-FU? April 18, 2019. ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/which-ambulatory-infusion-pump-is-best-for-5-fu. Accessed July 31, 2021.
  3. Salman D, Biliune J, Kayyali R, et al. Evaluation of the performance of elastomeric pumps in practice: are we under-delivering on chemotherapy treatments? Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33:2153-2159.
  4. Abe T, Matsuzaka K, Nakayama T, et al. Impact of air temperature and drug concentration on liquid emission from elastomeric pumps. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021;7:1. doi: 10.1186/s40780-020-00185-5.
  5. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Accidental overdoses involving fluorouracil infusions. June 18, 2015. www.ismp.org/resources/accidental-overdoses-involving-fluorouracil-infusions. Accessed August 31, 2021.
  6. Cusano EL, Ali R, Sawyer MB, et al. Baxter elastomeric pumps: weighing as an alternative to visual inspection. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018;24:163-169.
  7. Chambers CR, Pabia M, Sawyer M, Tang PA. Baxter elastomeric pumps: feasibility of weight estimates. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017;23:429-435.
Related Items
Evaluation of a Biosimilar Conversion in an Academic Medical Center Outpatient Infusion Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Outcomes of Supportive Care Versus Pharmacologic Intervention for the Management of CRS in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With BCMA- and GPRC5D-Directed Bispecifics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: Black Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Lung Cancer Care and Support Needs
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Live-Attenuated MMR Vaccination in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Receiving Daratumumab After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
A Real-World Analysis of Filgrastim and Biosimilars for Engraftment After Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation: Balancing Efficacy and Economics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Impact of an Oncolytic Pharmacist Prescription Verification Queue at an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Dexamethasone Versus Tocilizumab for Management of Talquetamab-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pemivibart, an IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody, for the Prevention of COVID-19 (CANOPY): Subset Analysis of Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Shortened Postinfusion Observation Times for Pertuzumab and Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Real-World Incidence of Infusion-Related Reactions With Sacituzumab Govitecan and Opportunities for Premedication De-Escalation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts