Skip to main content
Completed Research: PRACTICE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Abstract #CR18

Real-Life Study: Evaluation of the Safety of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM)

JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts, PARP Inhibitors

Presenting Authors: Marianne Boyer, BPharm, MSc, BCOP, and Marie-Lawrence Monfette, PharmD, MSc, BCOP, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Co-Authors: Sarah Villeneuve, PharmD Candidate, and Nathalie Letarte, PharmD, MSc, DESG, BCOP, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) significantly improve progression-free survival in ovarian cancer. However, these oral treatments have a safety profile that requires close monitoring. In a real-life setting, it is important to be aware of adverse events and their impact on treatment, such as treatment interruption, dose reduction or permanent discontinuation. Management of toxicities results in a significant burden for the treating team, including oncology nurse navigators and oncology pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the tolerance of PARPi in a population of patients with ovarian cancer in real-life settings and the impact on the workload of oncology nurses and pharmacists.

METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study including women with ovarian cancer treated with olaparib or niraparib as maintenance therapy between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, at Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM). The primary end point was to compare the incidence of adverse events between patients treated at CHUM and phase 3 trials. The secondary end points included analyzing the incidence of dose reduction or dose interruption and the interventions performed by oncology nurses and pharmacists.

RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included in this study, of whom 42 patients received olaparib and 23 received niraparib. Although 58% of patients required a dose reduction, 61% of them required at least 1 dose interruption. The majority of patients receiving niraparib initiated their treatment at a reduced dose of 200 mg once daily, regardless of weight, platelet count, and indication. Thrombocytopenia and fatigue were the most common hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events, leading to a dose interruption in 23% and 9% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events leading to dose modifications were nonhematologic adverse events (41%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and anemia (14%). Oncology pharmacists and nurses provided a median of 7 (2.5-70) interventions per patient monthly, with the most frequent interventions focusing on care coordination and laboratory monitoring. The median follow-up duration of patients was 8.3 months.

CONCLUSION: Our study shows that in real-world settings, PARPi use leads to a higher frequency of dose reductions. In addition, the monitoring of patients undergoing PARPi treatment places a substantial workload on the healthcare team. As the indication for these medications continues to broaden, workload is a factor to be considered, and a thoughtful approach is necessary to optimize the management of patients on PARPi treatment.

  1. Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2495-2505.
  2. González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. Niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2391-2402.
  3. Eakin CM, Ewongwo A, Pendleton L, et al. Real world experience of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor use in a community oncology practice. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159:112-117.
Related Items
Prospective Pharmacist-Led Monitoring of Patients Initiating PARP Inhibitor Therapy in the United States
JHOP - October 2025 Vol 15, No 5 published on October 14, 2025 in Original Research, Adverse Events, PARP Inhibitors
Optimizing Iron Dextran Infusion Protocols to Enhance Efficiency and Patient Throughput in an Outpatient Infusion Center: A Process Improvement Initiative
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Characteristics and Dosing Patterns of US Patients Diagnosed With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Initiating Abemaciclib at a Lower Dose Than the Approved 150 mg Twice Daily
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Clinical Outcomes of 2-Dose Tandem Influenza Vaccination Strategy in Patients With Plasma Cell Dyscrasias
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Dexamethasone Versus Tocilizumab for Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome Related to Teclistamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluating the Impact of Interactive Ambulatory Care Discussions at an Oncology Center
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of a Decentralized Infusion Pharmacist in an Oncology Infusion Clinic of an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of Reduced Observation Times for Subcutaneous Administration of Daratumumab and Hyaluronidase in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of Services Provided by Pharmacists in Addition to Accredited Patient Management Program Responsibilities in a Health-System Specialty Pharmacy
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts