Skip to main content
Completed Research: CLINICAL/TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Abstract #CR02

Characteristics and Dosing Patterns of US Patients Diagnosed With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Initiating Abemaciclib at a Lower Dose Than the Approved 150 mg Twice Daily

JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts
Andrea LeVoir, PharmD; Laura Spring, MD; Wambui Gathirua-Mwangi, PhD; Sangmi Kim, PhD; Zhanglin Lin Cui, PhD; Samuel Whipple, MPH, et al.

Presenting Author: Andrea LeVoir, PharmD, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

Co-Authors: Laura Spring, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Wambui Gathirua-Mwangi, PhD, Sangmi Kim, PhD, Zhanglin Lin Cui, PhD, Samuel Whipple, MPH, Astra M. Liepa, PharmD, Erich Brechtelsbauer, PharmD, MS, Raisa Volodarsky, PharmD, and Sarah Rybowski, MBBS, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Madeline Richey, MPH, and Jingru Wang, BS, Flatiron Health, New York City, NY; Hatem Soliman, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

BACKGROUND: Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy is approved for adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Anecdotal insights indicate providers may initiate abemaciclib at a lower dose than the approved 150 mg twice daily to aid tolerability with the aim to increase to the approved dose. This real-world study describes demographic and clinical characteristics, dosing patterns, and incidence of prespecified adverse events (AEs) in patients with early breast cancer who were started on abemaciclib at a lower dose.

METHODS: This study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health records–derived deidentified database. Patients started on abemaciclib October 2021 to November 2022 were included. All results were summarized descriptively. Additional analyses were conducted to compare characteristics of patients starting <150 mg twice daily versus 150 mg twice daily.

RESULTS: Among 453 patients, 65 started abemaciclib at <150 mg twice daily (median follow-up time, 7.1 months). Median age was 56 years, 33.8% had stage III disease, 49.2% had ECOG Performance Scale score of 0 and median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 0. Abemaciclib was frequently combined with aromatase inhibitors (92.3%), and most patients (56.9%) had a dose modification. The most common starting doses were 100 mg twice daily (56.9%) and 150 mg daily (24.6%); the time to first dose increase was 71 and 15 days, respectively. At first dose modification, 32.3% of patients increased the dose to 150 mg twice daily. Common real-world AEs were diarrhea (58.5%), fatigue (52.3%), and nausea/vomiting (40.0%). In comparison to patients started on 150 mg twice daily (n=388), patients started on a lower dose were more likely to be aged ≥75 years (4.9% vs 13.8%; P=.022).

CONCLUSIONS: In the real world, patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer started on abemaciclib at <150 mg twice daily were started on different doses and titration intervals. One-third of patients received the dose increase to 150 mg twice daily. Real-world AEs were generally consistent with clinical trial results.

This abstract was previously presented at the 2024 European Society for Medical Oncology Breast Cancer Annual Meeting.

Related Items
Optimizing Iron Dextran Infusion Protocols to Enhance Efficiency and Patient Throughput in an Outpatient Infusion Center: A Process Improvement Initiative
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Clinical Outcomes of 2-Dose Tandem Influenza Vaccination Strategy in Patients With Plasma Cell Dyscrasias
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Dexamethasone Versus Tocilizumab for Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome Related to Teclistamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluating the Impact of Interactive Ambulatory Care Discussions at an Oncology Center
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of a Decentralized Infusion Pharmacist in an Oncology Infusion Clinic of an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of Reduced Observation Times for Subcutaneous Administration of Daratumumab and Hyaluronidase in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluation of Services Provided by Pharmacists in Addition to Accredited Patient Management Program Responsibilities in a Health-System Specialty Pharmacy
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Hematologic Oral Oncolytics: Adherence, Healthcare Cost, and Utilization
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Identifying Barriers to Expanded Access Program (EAP) Patient Enrollment in the Hematology/Oncology Community
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts