Skip to main content
Completed Research: CLINICAL/TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Abstract #CR12

Assessment of Thromboprophylaxis Eligibility in Patients With Cancer at a Community Hospital

JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts
Christopher Clayton, PharmD, BCOP; Sol Atienza, PharmD, BCOP

Presenting Authors: Christopher Clayton, PharmD, BCOP, and Sol Atienza, PharmD, BCOP, Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, which can lead to hospitalizations, substantial patient care needs, and increased cost for patients with cancer. The incidence of VTE within 1 year of a cancer diagnosis is approximately 8%.1 Various risk-scoring tools have been evaluated to assess VTE risk based on clinical and laboratory factors. The current guidelines recommend the Khorana scoring tool to determine which patients with cancer are candidates for primary VTE prophylaxis.2

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a gap analysis to assess patients diagnosed with VTE and to determine which of those patients were eligible for VTE prophylaxis using the Khorana scoring tool.

METHODS: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a 900-bed community hospital between August 1, 2024, and September 1, 2025. The inclusion criteria were patients with cancer with a discharge diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who were actively receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The exclusion criteria were patients with multiple myeloma, acute leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasm, primary or metastatic brain tumor, carcinoma in situ, history of or risk for bleeding, having a cancer diagnosis during the current admission, and no chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 6 months. The data collection included malignancy, prechemotherapy platelet and leukocyte count, hemoglobin or red blood cell growth factor use, body mass index, anticoagulant medications, and the date of chemotherapy. The patients were evaluated using the Khorana score and were categorized as having a high risk for VTE when scores were ≥2.

RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were identified as diagnosed with cancer and VTE through diagnosis-related group codes on discharge. In all, 33 patients were excluded. Of the 60 patients assessed, 20 (33.3%) had Khorana scores of ≥2, showing eligibility for VTE prophylaxis. None of these patients were receiving VTE prophylaxis. A total of 7 patients were receiving anticoagulation for other reasons (eg, atrial fibrillation, previous VTE). Of the 20 patients, the cancer types were pancreas/lung (each 20%), gynecologic/bladder (each 10%), lymphoma/testicular (each 5%), and other (breast, head and neck, anal, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, colon, 30%). As per the Khorana score criteria, 20% of the cancers were very high risk and 50% were high risk, and the platelet, hemoglobin, leukocyte, and body mass index parameters were met in 25%, 55%, 30%, and 45% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The results confirm that primary VTE prophylaxis is underutilized. These data will be used as a baseline measurement to justify an electronic platform that identifies patients with cancer who are eligible for VTE prophylaxis in the clinical setting.

  1. Mahajan A, Brunson A, White R, Wun T. The epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: an update. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019;45:321-325.
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Version 3.2025. November 6, 2025. Accessed December 18, 2025. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/vte.pdf
  3. Ay C, Pabinger I, Cohen AT. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: burden, mechanisms, and management. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:219-230.
  4. Carrier M, Abou-Nassar K, Mallick R, et al. Apixaban to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:711-719.
  5. Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008;111:4902-4907.
  6. Khorana AA, Mackman N, Falanga A, et al. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8:11.
  7. Khorana AA, Otten HM, Zwicker JI, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer outpatients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12:1928-1931.
  8. Li A, May SB, La J, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk in cancer patients receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:1214-1222.
Related Items
Evaluation of a Biosimilar Conversion in an Academic Medical Center Outpatient Infusion Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Outcomes of Supportive Care Versus Pharmacologic Intervention for the Management of CRS in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With BCMA- and GPRC5D-Directed Bispecifics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: Black Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Lung Cancer Care and Support Needs
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Live-Attenuated MMR Vaccination in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Receiving Daratumumab After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
A Real-World Analysis of Filgrastim and Biosimilars for Engraftment After Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation: Balancing Efficacy and Economics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Impact of an Oncolytic Pharmacist Prescription Verification Queue at an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Dexamethasone Versus Tocilizumab for Management of Talquetamab-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pemivibart, an IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody, for the Prevention of COVID-19 (CANOPY): Subset Analysis of Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Shortened Postinfusion Observation Times for Pertuzumab and Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Real-World Incidence of Infusion-Related Reactions With Sacituzumab Govitecan and Opportunities for Premedication De-Escalation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts