Skip to main content
Late-Breaking Research: CLINICAL/TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Abstract #LB05

Hybrid Observation Model for Bispecific T-Cell Engager

JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts
Alyssa Cendagorta, PharmD, BCOP

Presenting Author: Alyssa Cendagorta, PharmD, BCOP, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

BACKGROUND: Risks of the bispecific T-cell engager tarlatamab include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). As part of the FDA’s accelerated approval, patients are required to be monitored in a healthcare facility after cycle 1 day 1 and day 8 doses.1 A more recent protocol does not require hospitalization for the monitoring of CRS; rather, it recommends 6 to 8 hours of postinfusion monitoring.2 Given that CRS occurring with tarlatamab has been characterized as mostly grade 1 and 2 in nature,3 our institution implemented a hybrid observation model starting in August 2024.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize our experience using a hybrid oncology administration model for tarlatamab, including patient demographics, safety outcomes (American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus grading), and length of stay information.

METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, tarlatamab was infused in patients in an outpatient setting, and patients were subsequently observed in the inpatient unit for CRS and ICANS monitoring and management.

RESULTS: From August 2024 to October 2025, there were 19 administrations of tarlatamab using this hybrid observation model. The median age of patients was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 61-68) with a median length of stay of 24 hours (IQR, 23-27). A total of 8 of the 19 observation stays involved the management of CRS and/or ICANS. Only 2 observations had to be extended into full inpatient encounters. CRS of any grade was observed in 40% of patients with either of the first 2 doses. All cases of CRS were grade 1 or 2. The incidence of CRS was found to be higher with dose 1 than dose 2, at 30% versus 13%, respectively. ICANS of any grade was observed in 40% of patients with either of the first 2 doses. The incidence of ICANS was similar with dose 1 and dose 2, at 30% and 25%, respectively. There were no cases of grade 3 or 4 ICANS.

CONCLUSION: A hybrid observation model can be safely used for oncology patients receiving tarlatamab to monitor for and manage CRS and ICANS. This allows for improved patient satisfaction and the ability to appropriately charge for these ambulatory services.

  1. Imdelltra (tarlatamab-dlle) [prescribing information]. Amgen, Inc; May 2024.
  2. Mountzios G, Sun L, Cho BC, et al. Tarlatamab in small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2025;393:349-361. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2502099
  3. Ahn M-J, Cho BC, Felip E, et al. Tarlatamab for patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:2063-2075. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307980
Related Items
Evaluation of a Biosimilar Conversion in an Academic Medical Center Outpatient Infusion Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Outcomes of Supportive Care Versus Pharmacologic Intervention for the Management of CRS in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With BCMA- and GPRC5D-Directed Bispecifics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: Black Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Lung Cancer Care and Support Needs
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Live-Attenuated MMR Vaccination in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Receiving Daratumumab After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
A Real-World Analysis of Filgrastim and Biosimilars for Engraftment After Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation: Balancing Efficacy and Economics
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Impact of an Oncolytic Pharmacist Prescription Verification Queue at an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Dexamethasone Versus Tocilizumab for Management of Talquetamab-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pemivibart, an IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody, for the Prevention of COVID-19 (CANOPY): Subset Analysis of Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Safety of Shortened Postinfusion Observation Times for Pertuzumab and Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts
Real-World Incidence of Infusion-Related Reactions With Sacituzumab Govitecan and Opportunities for Premedication De-Escalation
JHOP - March 2026 Vol 16 Special Feature published on March 3, 2026 in HOPA Abstracts