Skip to main content

Cost-Savings from Conversion to Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Allowed Budget-Neutral Expanded Access to Antineoplastic Therapy

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Simulation models demonstrate substantial cost-savings realized by conversion to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, and that these cost-savings could be reallocated to provide access to antineoplastic treatment on a budget-neutral basis.

A simulation modeling was performed to demonstrate that cost-savings generated from conversion of pegfilgrastim reference to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia in metastatic pancreatic cancer could be reallocated on a budget-neutral basis to provide expanded access to additional prophylaxis or to antineoplastic therapy. The results of this analysis were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

In this study, the following simulations were modeled: (1) cost-savings realized from using biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv (BIOSIM-PEG) instead of reference pegfilgrastim with or without on-body injector (PEG/PEG-OBI); (2) the potential for cost-savings achieved from converting to BIOSIM-PEG to provide expanded access to BIOSIM-PEG or chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX); and (3) the number-needed-to-convert (NNC) to BIOSIM-PEG to purchase 1 additional treatment of BIOSIM-PEG or FOLFIRINOX.

This simulation modeling utilized a hypothetical panel of 2500 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Three cost inputs for medication costs were: (1) Average Sales Price, derived from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Q4 2020 reimbursement; (2) wholesale acquisition cost (RED BOOK); (3) a blended Average Sales Price/wholesale acquisition cost rate proportionate to the estimated 2020 incident pancreatic cancer age distribution per the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Conversion rates from PEG/PEG-OBI to BIOSIM-PEG ranging from 10% to 100% between 1 and 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX were modeled.

In this metastatic pancreatic cancer cohort, cost-savings of using BIOSIM-PEG instead of PEG/PEG-OBI ranged from $188,780 (1 cycle at 10% conversion) to $22,653,609 (12 cycles at 100% conversion). The cost-savings for 1 cycle of chemotherapy translated into expanded access to additional BIOSIM-PEG prophylaxis, ranging from 106 cycles at 10% conversion to 1055 cycles at 100% or to between 643 and 4428 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, respectively. The cost-savings over 12 cycles could provide up to 6330 additional cycles of BIOSIM-PEG or 38,571 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (at 100% conversion). The NNC from PEG/PEG-OBI to purchase 1 additional cycle of BIOSIM-PEG is 2.37; the NNC to purchase 1 cycle of FOLFIRINOX is 0.39.

These simulated models demonstrate substantial cost-savings for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis realized by conversion to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv; these cost-savings could be reallocated to provide access to antineoplastic treatment on a budget-neutral basis.

Source: McBride A, MacDonald K, Abraham I. Cost efficiency and budget-neutral expanded access to antineoplastic therapy from cost-savings derived from conversion to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia (CIN/FN): simulation modeling in metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_3):441-441.

Related Items
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs, ASCO Highlights
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Article, Biosimilars, Transplant
Oncologists’ Common Misconceptions About Biosimilars Revealed in a Recent Survey
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60 versus Bevacizumab Reference in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous NSCLC
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or PFG-cbqv Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Bendamustine plus Rituximab and CHOP±R Regimens in Patients with Lymphoma and CLL
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Prophylaxis in miniCHOP Chemotherapy-Based Regimens for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Bevacizumab-awwb in Real-World Oncology Clinics
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Impact of the Oncology Care Model on Use of Bone Supportive Medications, Antiemetics, and Growth Factors
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Cost-Efficiency Analysis of Conversion from Pegfilgrastim with On-Body Injector to Pegfilgrastim-jmdb to Provide Budget-Neutral Expanded Access to Prophylaxis and Treatment
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars