Skip to main content

Final Rule Regarding Copay Accumulator Programs May Increase Patients’ Out-of-Pocket Costs for Oral Cancer Drugs

Web Exclusives - Ovarian Cancer

Copay accumulator programs are a new utilization management tool being implemented by private health plans that exclude copay assistance from counting toward the accumulated total costs being applied to a patient’s deductible and out-of-pocket maximum.

These programs, which typically monitor the use of oral therapies dispensed by specialty pharmacies, have been quietly implemented by several private health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers. Patient advocacy groups and other organizations have voiced opposition to copay accumulator programs, pointing out that they unfairly negate the support provided by copay assistance programs and add to patients’ out-of-pocket cost burdens.

Nevertheless, in April 2019, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finalized a proposal allowing private insurance plans to exclude the value of certain direct manufacturer cost-sharing support (eg, copay coupons) from a patient’s annual cost-sharing limit. However, it also ruled that copay accumulator programs are permitted only for drugs for which there is a generic equivalent.

The HHS’s Final Rule is unclear regarding biologic therapies, which are frequently used to treat patients with cancer. Although biologics are drugs in the technical sense, the FDA evaluates them differently from other agents. Pharmaceuticals are evaluated by the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, whereas biologics are reviewed by its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

Although the HHS has not clarified its position regarding biologics, many legal experts agree with the interpretation that the federal ruling does not apply to these products because they are different from pharmaceuticals.

The ruling will affect patients who may not understand how copay coupons are now applied and may ultimately affect prescription compliance because of the adjustment in out-of-pocket expenses. According to the National Community Oncology Dispensing Association, “The impact is significant for cancer patients needing assistance to pay for pharmaceutical therapies.”

Importantly, the Final Rule does not preempt actions taken by individual states. Currently, legislation in several states curbs or prohibits the use of copay accumulator programs. In March 2019, Virginia and West Virginia banned the use of these programs, and California and Massachusetts have limited their use when generic equivalents are available. Arizona has also passed its own legislation that aligns with HHS provisions on generic equivalents. Advocacy groups are continuing to focus efforts on abolishing copay accumulator programs at the state and federal levels.

Related Items
Duration of PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer With Germline or Somatic BRCA Mutations
JHOP - February 2024 Vol 14, No 1 published on February 22, 2024 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Duration of Response to PARP Inhibitors for Maintenance Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Germline or Somatic HRD
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Successful Extended At-Home Olaparib Desensitization After a Hypersensitivity Reaction: A Case Report
JHOP - June 2023 Vol 13, No 3 published on June 21, 2023 in Case Reports, PARP Inhibitors, Adverse Events, Oral Therapy, Ovarian Cancer
How to Sequence Treatment in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Gemogenovatucel-T Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Patient Self-Reporting of Tolerability in Phase 2 Trial Comparing Gemcitabine plus Adavosertib or Placebo in Women with Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
NeoPembrOV Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Pembrolizumab Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and Standard Systemic Therapy with or without Pembrolizumab for Advanced High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Optimal Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1 Study of GAS6/AXL Inhibitor (AVB-500) in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer