Skip to main content

Medicare Proposes Legislative Changes to Protected Drug Classes, Including Antineoplastics

Web Exclusives - Ovarian Cancer

The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) is implementing changes to protected classes of pharmaceuticals starting in 2020.

Since Medicare Part D was created, Medicare recipients have been given appropriate access to 6 specific classes of drugs (referred to as the protected classes). This has allowed patients to access “all or substantially all” medications within these 6 categories regardless of price so that they can maintain specific drug regimens prescribed by their physicians. This access has also helped to ensure that patients are adherent to the medicines they need to manage their chronic conditions.

Current Medicare Part D policy requires sponsors to include on their formularies all drugs in the 6 protected classes: (1) antidepressants; (2) antipsychotics; (3) anticonvulsants; (4) immunosuppressants for the treatment of transplant rejection; (5) antiretrovirals; and (6) antineoplastics, except in limited circumstances.

According to a recent CMS ruling, prior authorization and step therapy requirements are only permitted on new patient starts for 5 of the 6 classes (antiretrovirals are excluded). Although these requirements have been a part of existing Part D policy since 2006, this measure was finally approved in May 2019. Broader use of prior authorization and step therapy for drugs in these classes, which would affect current patients, was proposed but not approved.

Additional measures that were proposed but not finalized include excluding a drug in one of the protected classes from a formulary if the price exceeds a specific threshold over a set period, and excluding a drug in one of these classes from a formulary if the drug is a new formulation of an existing single-source product (without regard to whether the original formulation stayed on the market).

Many patient advocate groups have voiced opposition to these proposals, citing concerns that they would weaken the ability of Medicare recipients to access the critical medicines on which they rely.

“These [proposed] changes would have hindered patients’ access to medications, including those designed to target specific conditions that do not have a therapeutic equivalent. Timely access to the most clinically appropriate therapies is essential to achieving the best possible outcomes for cancer patients. Delays in obtaining the most clinically appropriate care results in poorer physical and psychosocial health outcomes, as well as increased out-of-pocket spending,” said Kim Czubaruk, Senior Director, Policy and Advocacy, Cancer Policy Institute, Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC.

Related Items
Duration of PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer With Germline or Somatic BRCA Mutations
JHOP - February 2024 Vol 14, No 1 published on February 22, 2024 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Duration of Response to PARP Inhibitors for Maintenance Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Germline or Somatic HRD
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Successful Extended At-Home Olaparib Desensitization After a Hypersensitivity Reaction: A Case Report
JHOP - June 2023 Vol 13, No 3 published on June 21, 2023 in Case Reports, PARP Inhibitors, Adverse Events, Oral Therapy, Ovarian Cancer
How to Sequence Treatment in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Gemogenovatucel-T Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Patient Self-Reporting of Tolerability in Phase 2 Trial Comparing Gemcitabine plus Adavosertib or Placebo in Women with Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
NeoPembrOV Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Pembrolizumab Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and Standard Systemic Therapy with or without Pembrolizumab for Advanced High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Optimal Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1 Study of GAS6/AXL Inhibitor (AVB-500) in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer