Skip to main content

State and Federal Legislation Addresses PBM Pricing Transparency

Web Exclusives - Ovarian Cancer

Drug pricing legislation was on the docket in 47 states in 2019, with more than 51 drug pricing bills passed in 33 states as of September 2019. Of 275 drug pricing bills considered at the state level in 2019, 27 bills passed in 20 states were designed to enhance pharmacy benefit management (PBM) transparency.

A growing number of state legislatures are introducing bills to outlaw a “gag clause” that prohibits pharmacists from informing consumers when less expensive prescription drug alternatives are available, and bills that prohibit copay “claw back” contract provisions. Gag clause legislation has already been passed in several states.

States are acting before the Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act (PDPRA), which passed by the Senate Finance Committee in bipartisan fashion, is presented to the full Senate. The PDPRA was drafted in July 2019 and an updated version was drafted on December 6, 2019. The Senate bill is narrower than the sweeping drug pricing reform bill (H.R. 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act) that was passed in the House on December 12, 2019, and will enter the Senate for consideration, although passage is unlikely.

“Pharmacy benefit managers and insurance companies have the opportunity to negotiate lower prices, but the American people don’t know how much these middlemen pocket for themselves,” said Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) in a prepared statement. “This legislation [PDPRA] shows that no industry is above accountability.” Like many state bills, a key feature of the PDPRA is increased oversight of PBMs that engage in claw backs and price spreading.

Claw backs are prescription drug overpayments that occur when “commercially insured patients’ copayments exceed the total cost of the drug to their insurer or pharmacy benefit manager.” As of October 2019, more than 20 states have passed some form of “claw back” legislation.

“In 2013, almost one quarter of filled pharmacy prescriptions (23%) involved a patient copayment that exceeded the average reimbursement paid by the insurer by more than $2.00,” according to a report by investigators at the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. “Among these overpayment claims, the average overpayment is $7.69.”

Price spreading refers to an amount kept by a PBM when he or she negotiates drug prices with a health plan instead of passing these savings on to pharmacies. Under the PDPRA draft legislation, PBMs would have to publicly publish annual reports on rebates, discounts, or price concessions that they negotiate for payers and state how much of these savings were passed on to payers. This proposed measure would take effect July 1, 2022.

Other bills at the state level would require PBMs to disclose business relationships with health plans and pharmacies.

Price increase reporting and price gouging legislation were also passed in a few states in 2019. Texas and Oregon passed bills that require manufacturers to report drug price increases that exceeded certain thresholds, with Oregon requiring that manufacturers report planned increases for certain drugs ≥60 days before they take effect. As part of new legislation, Virginia now requires that its Attorney General be notified when significant price increases are planned for generic drugs. The law also prohibits price gouging, “defined as unconscionable, excessive, or unjustified price increases for off-patent drugs deemed essential.”

Related Items
Duration of PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer With Germline or Somatic BRCA Mutations
JHOP - February 2024 Vol 14, No 1 published on February 22, 2024 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Duration of Response to PARP Inhibitors for Maintenance Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Germline or Somatic HRD
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Original Research, PARP Inhibitors, Ovarian Cancer, Screening
Successful Extended At-Home Olaparib Desensitization After a Hypersensitivity Reaction: A Case Report
JHOP - June 2023 Vol 13, No 3 published on June 21, 2023 in Case Reports, PARP Inhibitors, Adverse Events, Oral Therapy, Ovarian Cancer
How to Sequence Treatment in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Gemogenovatucel-T Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Patient Self-Reporting of Tolerability in Phase 2 Trial Comparing Gemcitabine plus Adavosertib or Placebo in Women with Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
NeoPembrOV Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Pembrolizumab Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and Standard Systemic Therapy with or without Pembrolizumab for Advanced High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Optimal Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1 Study of GAS6/AXL Inhibitor (AVB-500) in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer