Skip to main content

Population-Based, Real-World Data of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy + Pertuzumab + SB3 in HER2-Positive, Early Breast Cancer

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Population-based study results support the use of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy + pertuzumab + trastuzumab biosimilar SB3 treatment regimen in the real-world setting, with responses comparable with those achieved in clinical trials.

A randomized phase 3 trial demonstrated the similarity of the trastuzumab biosimilar SB3 to its reference trastuzumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early or locally advanced breast cancer.1 To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pertuzumab + SB3, an investigator-initiated study was conducted by the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) in patients with HER2-positive, early breast cancer in the real-world setting2; the results of this study were reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 Annual Meeting.

Consecutive patients in the DBCG database were identified who were diagnosed with unilateral early, HER2-positive breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pertuzumab + SB3 from September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2019.2 The primary outcome measure was pCR, which was defined as absence of residual invasive tumor in the breast and axillary lymph nodes.2

A total of 215 patients were identified who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + pertuzumab + SB3.2 In the study cohort, the median age was 54.8 years (range, 24-81 years); neoadjuvant chemotherapy predominantly consisted of cyclophosphamide + epirubicin followed by paclitaxel, or other chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel.2

Overall, 68% of patients with node-positive disease prior to receiving the neoadjuvant chemotherapy + pertuzumab + SB3 treatment regimen achieved node-negative status after completing the regimen.2 Following the neoadjuvant combination treatment regimen, 56% of patients achieved a pCR. Correlative analyses by demographic and pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathoanatomical factors showed that pCR was significantly related to low estrogen receptor status and high malignancy grade but not to clinical nodal status and tumor size. A trend toward a correlation was seen between pCR rate and small tumor size (pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and high HER2/Cep17 ratio.2

The findings from this population-based study indicate that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy + pertuzumab + SB3 treatment regimen may yield a pCR rate in the real-world setting that is comparable with those previously reported from clinical trials.3

References
1. Pivot X, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:968-974.
2. Andersson M, et al. ASCO 2020. Abstract 577.
3. Chen S, et al. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:973.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant