Skip to main content
COMPLETED RESEARCH: PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
Abstract #PM03

Safety of Switching e-Prescribing Platform Body Surface Area Calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller on Active Chemotherapy Doses

JHOP - March 2021 Vol 11 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts, Chemotherapy

Presenters: Nick Crozier, PharmD, BCPS, Pharmacy Director, UNM Cancer Center, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center; Ronald Kittson, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacy Supervisor, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center

Co-Authors: Lisa Anselmo, PharmD, BCOP, Clinical Pharmacy Director, Pharmacy, UNM Hospitals; Branda Chalenunphonh, Student Pharmacist, UNM College of Pharmacy

Background: Body surface area (BSA) is used to calculate individual doses for chemotherapeutic agents.1 Default BSA calculation equations vary between e-prescribing platforms. At the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNMCCC) our e-prescribing platform used DuBois & DuBois; however, because of the complexity of the DuBois & DuBois equation, our nurses and pharmacists use Mosteller. To improve safety, we changed our e-prescribing platform calculation to Mosteller.

Objective: To determine whether switching BSA calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller results in clinical differences in dose or in outcomes for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Methods: The UNMCCC switched from the DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller BSA calculation on July 6, 2020. We collected data that included changes in BSA, therapeutic dose changes, and adverse event reporting. We extracted data for all chemotherapeutic agents that required BSA dosing between May 1, 2020, and August 10, 2020, to compare chemotherapy doses given to patients before and after the calculation switch date. Patients who received the same chemotherapeutic agent as part of the same regimen at least once before and after July 6, 2020, were included. Only the latest chemotherapy dose before July 6, 2020, and the earliest dose after July 6, 2020, were evaluated. We used each patient’s most recent height and weight before July 6, 2020, to calculate predicted Mosteller BSA. Finally, we examined individually all dose increases by ≥5%, for safety.

Results: A total of 227 patients who received a total of 367 doses were evaluated. In all, 234 doses had no change, 10 doses increased by 5% to 10%, and 6 doses increased by >10%. We calculated the predicted patient BSA change corresponding to 330 of the doses. Of the predicted BSA changes, 23% were expected to increase by ≥2.5% and 6.67% were expected to increase by 5% to 10%. Predicted BSA changes correlated poorly with dose changes (r2 = 0.0058). Most doses remained unchanged because of physician manual calculations, use of previous BSA option, and pharmacist dose adjustment and rounding. Dose increases of >10% were caused by changes in the patient’s weight and provider’s chemotherapy regimen adjustment. There were no adverse events reported or safety concerns.

Conclusion: Switching the e-prescribing platform BSA calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller resulted in an overall increase in our patients’ calculated BSA, without significant clinical impact on the patients’ dose or outcome. The change from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller can be safely made in clinical practice for patients receiving active chemotherapy.

  1. Fancher KM, Sacco AJ, Gwin RC, et al. Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016;22:690-695.
Related Items
Risk for Vincristine-Induced Adverse Events With Aprepitant in Pediatric Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma
JHOP - April 2026 Vol 16, No 2 published on January 20, 2026 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Chemotherapy, Drug–Drug Interaction
Implementation of a Cardio-Oncology Pharmacist Position in a Community Cancer Center
JHOP - April 2026 Vol 16, No 2 published on January 2, 2026 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Adverse Events, Chemotherapy, Drug–Drug Interaction, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Oral Therapy
Evaluation of Bleeding Events in Patients Who Received Ibrutinib With or Without Antithrombotic Therapy
JHOP - February 2026 Vol 16, No 1 published on November 14, 2025 in Original Research, Chemotherapy, Adverse Events
Highly Effective Treatment for Bone-Only Signet Ring Cell Breast Cancer With Ribociclib, Fulvestrant, and Denosumab: A Case Study
JHOP - October 2025 Vol 15, No 5 published on July 17, 2025 in Case Reports, Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy
Evaluation of Outcomes and Adverse Events of a Hypomethylating Agent Plus Venetoclax Versus 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years
JHOP - June 2025 Vol 15, No 3 published on June 11, 2025 in Original Research, Venetoclax, Chemotherapy, Leukemia
Irinotecan-Induced Hypertonia: A Case Report
JHOP - June 2025 Vol 15, No 3 published on May 23, 2025 in Case Reports, Adverse Events, Chemotherapy
Financial Effect of Automated Chemotherapy Dose Rounding at an Academic Medical Center
JHOP - June 2025 Vol 15, No 3 published on May 22, 2025 in Original Research, Chemotherapy
Mannitol Administration and the Risk for Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity
JHOP - April 2025 Vol 15, No 2 published on April 7, 2025 in Original Research, Chemotherapy, Adverse Events
Optimizing Iron Dextran Infusion Protocols to Enhance Efficiency and Patient Throughput in an Outpatient Infusion Center: A Process Improvement Initiative
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts
Characteristics and Dosing Patterns of US Patients Diagnosed With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Initiating Abemaciclib at a Lower Dose Than the Approved 150 mg Twice Daily
JHOP - March 2025 Vol 15 Special Feature published on March 12, 2025 in HOPA Abstracts