Skip to main content

Cost-Savings of Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim in a Medicare Oncology Care Model Population

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Pegfilgrastim biosimilars have provided significant cost-savings to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services among the Oncology Care Model population, possibly resulting from stabilization and reduction in net-acquisition-cost prices of reference pegfilgrastim rather than greater utilization of biosimilars.

A real-world data analysis characterized the impact of the clinical availability of 2 pegfilgrastim biosimilars on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement for pegfilgrastim in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; these results were reported at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program.

Using a data sample from the Medicare Oncology Care Model (OCM) population, the average CMS reimbursement for pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Neulasta, Udenyca, and Fulphila) utilization between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, was identified. The average reimbursement and the average change in reimbursement before and after the availability of biosimilars was compared.

In the third quarter of 2018 (prior to the availability of biosimilars), the Medicare Part B reimbursement of reference pegfilgrastim increased at a rate of $292 per year, resulting in an average reimbursement of $3636 per administration. In the time period from July 2018 through June 2019 coinciding with the availability of biosimilars, the average pegfilgrastim reimbursement remained stable, at $3543 per administration. The change in reimbursement decreased from $292 per year prior to availability of biosimilars to –$93 per year following the availability of biosimilars.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, applying the reimbursement patterns found in the Medicare OCM data to the general Medicare population, it was estimated that the utilization of biosimilars is associated with a $4.8-million cost-savings (1.39%) relative to the total expected reimbursement without biosimilars in the market. Higher cost-savings were projected in 2019 ($79.1 million; 5.39%) and 2020 ($157.9 million; 11.5%). Given that 90.6% of patients in the second quarter of 2019 were receiving reference pegfilgrastim, the authors attributed the projected cost containment largely to stabilization and reduction in net-acquisition-cost prices of reference pegfilgrastim rather than greater utilization of biosimilars.

These results indicate that the increased overall value proposition of pegfilgrastim is providing significant cost-savings to CMS, and could potentially benefit clinical practices participating in the OCM.

Reference
Webster J, et al. ASCO 2020. Abstract e19362.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant