Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety Equivalence of Proposed High-Concentration Adalimumab Biosimilar to Reference Adalimumab in Moderate-to-Severe, Active RA

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

A randomized, double-blind phase 3 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety equivalence of the adalimumab biosimilar candidate CT-P17 to reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

CT-P17 is a proposed biosimilar of the high-concentration (100 mg/mL) and citrate-free formulation of reference adalimumab. A randomized, double-blind phase 3 study was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of CT-P17 with reference adalimumab in patients with active, moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) up to week 52; study results were reported at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Convergence 2020 meeting.

Inclusion criteria were adult patients with active, moderate-to-severe RA despite methotrexate treatment. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive CT-P17 40 mg or reference adalimumab every 2 weeks up to week 24. Prior to dosing at week 26, patients in the reference adalimumab group were re-randomized to either continue reference adalimumab or switch to CT-P17 until the end of the study; all patients initially randomized to CT-P17 continued receiving CT-P17. The primary end point was ACR20 (a composite measure defined as improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure, visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein) response rate at week 24; secondary end points were efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity.

A total of 648 eligible patients received CT-P17 (n = 324) or reference adalimumab (n = 324). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was the same between the CT-P17 and reference adalimumab groups (82.7% for both), with confidence intervals of the treatment difference within the prespecified equivalence margins (European Medicines Agency, ±15%; US Food and Drug Administration, –12% to +15%). Secondary efficacy end points were also similar between groups.

Overall, safety profiles of the 2 groups were similar; 52.2% of patients in the biosimilar group and 56.8% of patients in the reference adalimumab group experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the majority of TEAEs were grade 1/2. The most common TEAEs were injection-site reactions, occurring in 4.9% of patients in the CT-P17 group versus 6.8% in the reference adalimumab group. A total of 26 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent serious adverse events. TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported in 5 patients in the CT-P17 group versus 8 patients in the reference adalimumab group.

A lower proportion of patients developed antidrug antibodies (ADAs) at week 24 in the CT-P17 group versus the reference adalimumab (28.7% vs 35.8%; P = .0643). Of these, neutralizing ADAs were developed by 83 (25.6%) CT-P17–treated patients and 103 (31.8%) patients who received reference adalimumab.

This study demonstrated efficacy equivalence between the biosimilar CT-P17 and reference adalimumab over 24 weeks in patients with active, moderate-to-severe RA in terms of ACR20 response rates and other efficacy end points assessed.

Reference
Kay J, et al. ACR 2020. Abstract 800.

Related Items
Arthralgia Rates and Treatment Among Patients Receiving Bevacizumab-awwb Versus Bevacizumab
JHOP - August 2026 Vol 16, No 4 published on April 3, 2026 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Biosimilars
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols