Skip to main content

Bioequivalence of Bevacizumab Reference and Its Biosimilar BCD-021 in Nonsquamous NSCLC

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

The results of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study established the equivalence of bevacizumab reference to its biosimilar BCD-021 in terms of clinical efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in patients with NSCLC.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of the bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 with bevacizumab reference product in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); the results of this study were reported at the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 (for Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine) or 2:1 (for India) ratio to receive BCD-021 or bevacizumab reference in combination with chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients with stable disease or complete or partial responses at week 18 were eligible to receive BCD-021 until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy end point was objective response rate (ORR) at week 19 and confirmed 4 weeks thereafter. Secondary end points were safety, PK, and immunogenicity; the primary PK end point was area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t after first infusion.

In patients in the modified intent-to-treat population who received treatment and had ≥1 computed tomography scans after study initiation, 205 of the 341 patients received BCD-021 and 136 patients received bevacizumab reference. ORRs were similar in the BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference groups (34.6% vs 33.8%), with a risk difference of 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], –9.5%-11.1%), which fell within the prespecified acceptance criteria of –12% to 12%. The 90% CI for risk ratio was 79.6% to 131.7%, which fell within the prespecified equivalence margins of 75% to 133.33%. Sensitivity analysis for ORR with race as a covariate resulted in 90% CI for risk ratio (79.2%-132.1%). In Indian and non-Indian patient populations, the 90% CIs for the ratios of geometric means of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t values for BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference were within the predefined acceptance criteria for equivalence after first infusion (80%-125%).

Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable in the BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference groups (91.3% vs 93.4%); the most common adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, and alopecia.

PK parameters (trough concentration and maximum serum concentration) were comparable between BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference. In terms of immunogenicity, the incidence of antidrug antibodies was comparable between BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference.

These study results demonstrated equivalence between BCD-021 and bevacizumab reference in terms of ORR risk difference and risk ratio, safety, PK, and immunogenicity parameters.

Source: Fadeeva N, Roy B, Nagarkar R, et al. A phase III study comparing BCD-021, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and reference bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(suppl_5):S949-S1039.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant