Skip to main content

Biosimilar Uptake of Filgrastim and Impact on Spending in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

A retrospective, cross-sectional review reported significant uptake of biosimilar filgrastim products in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019 being associated with a small decrease in aggregate spending, essentially unchanged per-unit spending, and increased spending per beneficiary on filgrastim products, all attributed to the inability of Medicare Part D to directly negotiate prices with manufacturers.

A retrospective, cross-sectional review evaluated utilization trends of filgrastim biosimilars and impact on spending among Medicare Part D beneficiaries. The results of the analysis were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Using the 2015 to 2019 Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event data, this study assessed annual spending, number of beneficiaries, number of claims, spending per beneficiary, and spending per dosage unit of filgrastim, as well as per the biosimilars filgrastim-sndz and tbo-filgrastim.

The total aggregate Part D spending on filgrastim products was $78 million in 2019, of which the biosimilars share was $44 million (56%); that increased from $1.8 million (2%) in 2015. From 2015 to 2019, total spending on filgrastim reference decreased by 58%. Whereas biosimilar uptake progressively increased every year, total aggregate spending on all filgrastim forms decreased only 7% from 2015 to 2019 ($84 million to $78 million). From 2015 to 2019, for all 3 filgrastim forms, trends in spending were average spending per claim ($3193-$2549; –20%), average spending per beneficiary ($5880-$6722; +15%), and average spending per dosage unit of filgrastim ($583 vs $571; –2%).

Based on these results, the significant uptake of biosimilar filgrastim products in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019 was associated with a small decrease in aggregate spending, essentially unchanged per-unit spending, and increased spending per beneficiary on filgrastim products, all attributed to the inability of Medicare Part D to directly negotiate prices with manufacturers. These results are in contrast with the significant cost-savings associated with biosimilar filgrastim uptake in Medicare Part B and Medicaid programs.

Source: Hussaini S, Gupta A, Anderson KE, et al. Biosimilar uptake of filgrastim and impact on spending in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_28):67.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant