Skip to main content

Incidence of Hypertension and Proteinuria in Bevacizumab- and Bevacizumab Biosimilar-Treated Cohorts

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Preliminary findings of this retrospective study indicate that treatment with bevacizumab reference product may be associated with a higher risk for hypertension and proteinuria, whereas treatment with bevacizumab biosimilars correlated with shorter onset of these adverse events.

Comparative safety analysis of the bevacizumab biosimilars and the reference product is limited. Therefore, a retrospective study sought to evaluate the incidence of hypertension and proteinuria and their associated risk factors in patients treated with reference versus biosimilar bevacizumab.

This retrospective study identified patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were treated with either reference bevacizumab or biosimilar bevacizumab between January 2019 and July 2020 at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. In the analysis, electronic health records were searched for the presence or absence of hypertension and proteinuria and time to event. To assess the risk association with hypertension and proteinuria, information including demographics, hypertension- and proteinuria-related risk factors, bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy regimen, and bevacizumab dosing were identified.

A total of 75 patients were included in the analysis; of these, 42 patients received bevacizumab and 33 patients received bevacizumab biosimilars. Hypertension occurred more frequently in the bevacizumab reference group versus the biosimilar group (52.4% vs 36.4%; P = .242); however, the difference was not statistically significant. After treatment initiation, the median time to hypertension was significantly longer in the bevacizumab reference group versus the biosimilar group (84 days vs 24.5 days; P = .0064). A slightly higher proportion of patients in the bevacizumab reference group developed proteinuria (35.7% vs 30%; P = .7193). The median onset of proteinuria was significantly longer in the bevacizumab reference group than in the biosimilar group (213 days vs 53.5 days; P = .0022). Risk assessments showed that a history of hypertension was associated with increased risk for further hypertension, whereas underlying renal dysfunction increased the risk for proteinuria.

These results suggest a higher risk for hypertension and proteinuria with the bevacizumab reference product, although the differences did not reach statistical significance and indicate a shorter onset of these adverse events with the bevacizumab biosimilars. Further studies in larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these results.

Source: Man Y, Han Y, Mukherjee S, et al. Incidence of hypertension and proteinuria in patients treated with bevacizumab versus bevacizumab biosimilar. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_3):83.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant