Skip to main content

Real-World Overall Response Rate and Other Outcomes Related to Originator and Biosimilar Rituximab in Patients with CLL or NHL in the United Kingdom

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

The results of a noninterventional, retrospective study showed that rituximab originator and the rituximab-abbs biosimilars yielded comparable efficacy and tolerability in the first-line treatment of patients with CLL and NHL, with rituximab-abbs use resulting in cost-savings.

A noninterventional, retrospective study assessed the real-world patient outcomes relating to effectiveness and tolerability of the rituximab originator and its biosimilar rituximab-abbs in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the United Kingdom; the results of this study were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Data on patient characteristics, response to treatment, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were abstracted retrospectively via an online physician survey. UK-registered hematologists and oncologists reported on randomly selected patients aged 18 years from 4 cohorts with documented CLL or NHL who had received rituximab-abbs or rituximab as first-line immunotherapy (between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019). Patient outcomes data were provided from the first treatment to the last date of follow-up available in the medical records.

A total of 46 participating physicians identified 201 patients with CLL or NHL who were treated with rituximab or rituximab-abbs. In terms of efficacy outcomes, the overall response rate, 6-month progression-free survival, and 1-year survival were comparable for rituximab and rituximab-abbs in patients with CLL or NHL.

Across cohorts, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, and infusion reactions. Healthcare resource utilization was high but similar across cohorts, owing to drug costs, diagnostic testing, oncologist office visits, and day hospital admissions. Use of rituximab-abbs realized a mean annual savings of approximately £1,000 per patient, which was attributed to first-line treatment costs.

Based on the results of this noninterventional retrospective study, it was concluded that the rituximab originator and the rituximab-abbs biosimilar yielded comparable efficacy and tolerability in the first-line treatment of patients with CLL and NHL, with rituximab-abbs utilization resulting in cost-savings.

Source: McBride A, Daniel S, Driessen MT, et al. Real-world overall response rate and other outcomes related to originator and biosimilar rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the United Kingdom. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_15):e18696.

Related Items
A Survey of Biosimilar Adoption Across Oncology Pharmacy Practices
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Biosimilars
Biosimilar Utilization Management Within an Employee Health Plan Population
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols, Cost of Care
Obinutuzumab Use After Serum Sickness in a Patient With Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report
JHOP - October 2024 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 11, 2024 in Case Reports, Lymphoma, Adverse Events, Monoclonal Antibodies, Biosimilars
Biosimilars in Oncology Practice: A Multi-Site Health System Examination of the Use and Perception of Oncology Biosimilars
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 18, 2024 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Biosimilars, Cost of Care, Adverse Events
Real-World Tolerability and Financial Impact of Biosimilar Bevacizumab-awwb Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Cancer
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 17, 2024 in Original Research, Cost of Care, Adverse Events, Biosimilars, VEGF Inhibitors
A Review of Clinical Data Among Biosimilars: Just How Similar Are They?
JHOP - August 2023 Vol 13, No 4 published on August 17, 2023 in Review Article, Biosimilars, Cost of Care
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Reference Drug Filgrastim and Biosimilar Filgrastim-sndz in Pediatric Patients Used for Post–Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Engraftment or Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis
JHOP - February 2023 Vol 13, No 1 published on February 27, 2023 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Pediatric Cancer, Transplant, Chemotherapy
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights, Oncology Pharmacy Programs/Protocols
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Research, Biosimilars, Transplant