Skip to main content

SAL-DaunoDouble Trial Interim Analysis: Single versus Double Induction with 7+3 for Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML

2020 Year in Review - AML - Leukemia

Data are lacking on the value of a second induction cycle in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a good early response at day 15 after first induction with 7 days of cytarabine plus 3 days of anthracycline (7+3). Interim results are available from the German Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL)-DaunoDouble trial, which prospectively assessed the outcome of patients with a good early response according to the number of induction cycles. Noninferiority of single versus double induction was assumed if the rate of complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was within a margin of 7.5%.

Newly diagnosed patients with AML, aged 18 to 65 years, received a first induction cycle with 7 days of cytarabine plus 3 days of daunorubicin (7+3). A blast count <5% on day 15 after the initiation of chemotherapy was defined as good response. Patients with good response were then randomized to a second induction cycle (arm D [double]) versus no additional induction (arm S [single]). The primary end point was CR/CRi rate after induction; secondary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

A total of 624 patients were enrolled and received a first 7+3 induction cycle between 2014 and 2020. Of these patients, 270 (43%) achieved a marrow blast clearance (blasts <5%) on day 15 and were randomized to arm S (n = 133) or arm D (n = 137). The median age was 52 years, and NPM1 and FLT3–internal tandem duplication mutations were present in 53.2% and 24% of patients, respectively. Favorable, intermediate, and adverse European LeukemiaNet risk was observed among 55.1%, 35%, and 9.9% of patients, respectively. A total of 86% and 85.1% of patients achieved CR/CRi after single and double induction, respectively. For 224 predefined per-protocol patients, the CR/CRi rates were 88.2% versus 91.4% (95% confidence interval, –4.7-11.1; P value for noninferiority = .145) for single and double induction, respectively. The 3-year RFS was lower following single induction versus double induction after a median follow-up of 24 months (53% vs 63%; P = .12). Landmark 3-year OS rates were similar with single versus double induction (74% vs 75%; P = .64). Adverse events were similar between arms, occurring in 97.7% and 97.1% of patients for the single- and double-induction arms, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13.5% of patients in the single-induction arm and 15.3% of patients in the double arm.

The interim analysis of the SAL-DaunoDouble trial suggests that single induction with a 7+3 regimen of cytarabine plus anthracycline in patients with AML with a good early response at day 15 may be noninferior to double induction, although the results were not statistically significant for this comparison.

Reference
Rollig C, Steffen B, Alakel N, et al. Remission and Survival after Single Versus Double Induction with 7+3 for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the Planned Interim Analysis of Randomized Controlled SAL-DaunoDouble Trial. Presented at: 62nd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition, December 5-8, 2020. Abstract 458.

Related Items
Calaspargase-Pegol Use in a Pediatric Patient Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Case Report
JHOP - August 2025 Vol 15, No 4 published on August 20, 2025 in Case Reports, Pediatric Cancer, Leukemia, Adverse Events
Evaluation of Outcomes and Adverse Events of a Hypomethylating Agent Plus Venetoclax Versus 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years
JHOP - June 2025 Vol 15, No 3 published on June 11, 2025 in Original Research, Venetoclax, Chemotherapy, Leukemia
Financial Impact and Utilization of a Pharmacist-Driven Home Infusion Pathway for Blinatumomab in Patients Requiring Short-Term Inpatient Monitoring After Outpatient Initiation of Blinatumomab
JHOP - June 2025 Vol 15, No 3 published on June 11, 2025 in Practical Issues in Pharmacy Management, Leukemia
Rapid Onset of Fatal Tumor Lysis Syndrome in a Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Azacitidine and Venetoclax Without a Ramp-Up Schedule: A Case Report
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Case Reports, Leukemia, Venetoclax, Chemotherapy, Adverse Events
Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Adults and Pediatric Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Received Chemotherapy
JHOP - August 2024 Vol 14, No 4 published on August 2, 2024 in Original Research, Infections, Pediatric Cancer, Leukemia, Chemotherapy
Addition of Venetoclax to Intensive Induction Regimens for AML Does Not Increase Rates of Febrile Neutropenia
JHOP - June 2024 Vol 14, No 3 published on May 23, 2024 in Original Research, Venetoclax, Leukemia, Adverse Events, Chemotherapy
Split- and Reduced-Dose Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Case Report
JHOP - June 2024 Vol 14, No 3 published on May 23, 2024 in Case Reports, Leukemia, Dose Escalation/Reduction, Adverse Events, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Targeted Therapies
Safety of Venetoclax Without Dose Ramp-Up When Used in Combination With a Hypomethylating Agent for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 1, 2024 in Original Research, Leukemia, Adverse Events, Chemotherapy, Venetoclax
Managing Differentiation Syndrome Associated with Treatment for AML
JHOP - February 2024 Vol 14, No 1 published on February 26, 2024 in Symptom Management Overview, Leukemia, Adverse Events
Real-World Analysis of Oral Chemotherapy Dose Modifications During Maintenance Therapy for Young Adults With ALL
JHOP - February 2024 Vol 14, No 1 published on February 22, 2024 in Original Research, Chemotherapy, Oral Therapy, Leukemia, Methotrexate