Skip to main content

CAR T-Cell Manufacturing Process Depends on Good-Quality T-Cells

Web Exclusives - Immunotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has had excellent results in late-stage leukemia and varying degrees of success in some other hematologic cancers, but thus far, solid tumors have not responded to this therapy.

CAR T-cell therapy entails extracting a patient’s own T-cells and genetically re-engineering them ex vivo to express an antigen on cancer cells (ie, the manufacturing process). Then, the CAR T-cell product is reinfused back into the patient, where it hopefully undergoes expansion.

The CAR T-cell drug is not always successfully manufactured in all patients with leukemia or in patients with solid tumors. The problem with unsuccessful CAR T-cell drug manufacturing appears to be the poor quality of T-cells harvested from some patients, according to an abstract presented at the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting.

“There are a number of challenges to making the CAR T-cell product. Manufacturing techniques vary at different centers. We found that sometimes T-cells didn’t work at all in some cases of leukemia, and there were a number of patients we could not treat because the T-cells died. When we went back and looked, we found a difference in the starting material [ie, the T-cells],” explained lead investigator David M. Barrett, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, who presented the results.

Studies by Dr Barrett’s group showed that metabolic pathways were implicated in T-cell quality. T-cells that used glutamine and fatty acid pathways as fuel sources had excellent CAR T-cell potential, whereas those that depended on glycolysis, another fuel source, were poorly equipped to undergo the CAR T-cell manufacturing process.

Preliminary studies by Dr Barrett’s group suggest that it is possible to manipulate T-cells so that they use fatty acids for fuel rather than glycolysis, and studies are ongoing to see if this will improve the CAR T-cell manufacturing process.

As Dr Barrett explained, “We find that T-cells with highly activated glycolysis pathways ended up performing worse when we tried to make them into CAR T-cells. Substituting and supplementing heavily with fatty acids did seem to improve this a little, but it’s not a home run. I think we will need to attack this from multiple pathways. We are working on those experiments now.”

The data he presented at the AACR meeting were based on analysis of peripheral blood samples from 157 pediatric patients with hematologic cancers, such as acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and solid tumors, which was performed at diagnosis and after each cycle of chemotherapy.

“More than 90% of patients with ALL had high-quality T-cells, and more than 50% of those with Wilms’ tumor had good CAR T-cell potential at diagnosis. Lymphomas and solid tumors had poor CAR-T potential. We have not yet developed a CAR-T product for Wilms’ tumor,” Dr Barrett noted.

The researchers looked at CAR T-cell potential after chemotherapy and found that cumulative chemotherapy led to a decline in CAR T-cell potential for all tumor types, suggesting that adjusting chemotherapy regimens could improve T-cell quality. Certain types of chemotherapy (ie, cyclophosphamide- and doxorubicin-containing regimens) were especially harmful to CAR T-cell potential.

“We have gotten CAR T-cells to work for leukemia, but we have not yet been very successful in solid tumors.…Our data suggest that poor T-cell starting material may be a key first problem. The T-cells from solid-­tumor patients may need different manufacturing protocols to be successful,” Dr Barrett said.

Other metabolic pathways may be implicated in poor-quality T-cells. Dr Barrett considers this research a first step in elucidating which pathways may be implicated and how to reverse them.

“This study is a great example of the intersection between immunotherapy and precision medicine,” said AACR President Michael Caligiuri, MD, MA, President, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, who moderated a premeeting webinar where these data were presented.

“Gene expression identifies the energy pathways that T-cells use. Some of these T-cells seem to be exhausted,” Dr Caligiuri said. “The energy pathways seem to predict who will do well and who won’t. We can try to develop alternate chemotherapies that don’t exhaust T-cells and also try to reverse the metabolic pathways that seem to be detrimental.”

Related Items
Evaluation of Serious Immune-Related Adverse Event Incidence in 200-mg Versus 400-mg Pembrolizumab Regimens
JHOP - December 2025 Vol 15, No 6 published on December 1, 2025 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy
Assessment of Appropriate Anticoagulation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma—A Health-System Specialty Pharmacy Retrospective Evaluation
JHOP - February 2026 Vol 16, No 1 published on August 13, 2025 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Multiple Myeloma, Immunotherapy, Thromboembolism
Advancing Merkel-Cell Carcinoma Treatment With Immunotherapy
Web Exclusives published on August 6, 2025 in HOPA Corner, Immunotherapy
Management of Severe Hypersensitivity Reaction and Serum Sickness in a Case of Aplastic Anemia: Case Report Using Tocilizumab
JHOP - October 2025 Vol 15, No 5 published on July 24, 2025 in Case Reports, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy, Infusion Issues, Monoclonal Antibodies
Tisotumab Vedotin With Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of a Patient With Metastatic Vaginal Cancer: A Case Report
JHOP - February 2025 Vol 15, No 1 published on February 13, 2025 in Case Reports, Immunotherapy, Antibody–Drug Conjugates , Gynecologic Cancers
HARMONI-2 Demonstrating “Significant” Improvement in PFS With Ivonescimab Over Pembrolizumab
Web Exclusives published on December 13, 2024 in Immunotherapy
Treatment With Anakinra After Initially Receiving Tocilizumab for Cytokine Release Syndrome
JHOP - December 2024 Vol 14, No 6 published on December 5, 2024 in Original Research, CAR T-Cell Therapy, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy, Monoclonal Antibodies
Comparison of Adverse Events Between 2 Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Dosing Regimens
JHOP - June 2024 Vol 14, No 3 published on May 23, 2024 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy, Checkpoint Inhibitors, Dose Escalation/Reduction
The Effect of Dosing Schedule on the Incidence of Immune-Related AEs and Infusion Reactions in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy
JHOP - April 2024 Vol 14, No 2 published on April 1, 2024 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy, Infusion Issues
Incidence of Hypothyroidism in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
JHOP - December 2022 Vol 12, No 6 published on December 20, 2022 in Original Research, Adverse Events, Immunotherapy, Checkpoint Inhibitors